|
|
Keywords: Qualia, Jackson,
Explanatory gap, Physicalism, Causal theory of knowledge,
Epiphenomenalism.
|
|
|
|
Abstract: Frank Jackson's knowledge argument against
physicalism has caused an extensive debate. In this paper, I
sketch and examine a new argument against Jackson's view, an
argument which appears to retain more of physicalism than
other replies to Jackson. this argument draws strength from
a causal theory of knowledge, and hold that there is no
knowledge of epiphenomenal qualia, hence that Jackson's main
conclusions from the thought experiment are incorrect. There
are still problems with this argument, however, so the
question remains how much of the mental that can be
accounted for in physicalist terms.
|
|